User talk:A1Cafel
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||
Just a little hint. With all due respect
[edit]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6zaCV4niKk&ab_channel=Yusuf%2FCatStevens
There are people who always manage to turn a good day into a bad day for others. And there are also people like you who make it almost impossible to take further part in this project.
Think about it. Just keep your own problems to yourself and start having a little more respect for others. The world is beautiful, and it's beautiful because there are people who are constructive. I realize this won't even affect you emotionally, but I just wanted to let you know. Hubertl 17:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- good music. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- but rude message. // sikander { talk } 🦖 22:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see sincerity in the message. This account is still tolerated in this project only because it acts like a worm that decomposes garbage, and nothing more. It's a pity that it doesn't focus on the real garbage – copyright violations – but on images related to freedom of panorama. Being autistic like them, I understand their hyperfocus, but I would like them to realize it and start acting constructively instead of being so harassing as they are now. Please note that nominating images to deletion due to violating freedom of panorama is not and has never been the issue with this account. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Hubertl, Modern primat, and RodRabelo7: Actually this account is bordering the problem user. We should also face the matter of users with whom interaction is difficult to impossible. -- Blackcat 09:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Blackcat - I noticed the Commons link you provided below. @Hubertl to your point, there is "history" here in a similar link for English Wikipedia, where they were indefinately blocked for "abusing multiple accounts." -- Ooligan (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
PS Moreover. It's a problem user who abused the patience of administrators. If it were for me I wouldn't have unblocked because they's disrupting the project. 12.26, 14 Ağustos 2024 Blackcat (A)
- @Blackcat - I noticed the Commons link you provided below. @Hubertl to your point, there is "history" here in a similar link for English Wikipedia, where they were indefinately blocked for "abusing multiple accounts." -- Ooligan (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hubertl, Modern primat, and RodRabelo7: Actually this account is bordering the problem user. We should also face the matter of users with whom interaction is difficult to impossible. -- Blackcat 09:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see sincerity in the message. This account is still tolerated in this project only because it acts like a worm that decomposes garbage, and nothing more. It's a pity that it doesn't focus on the real garbage – copyright violations – but on images related to freedom of panorama. Being autistic like them, I understand their hyperfocus, but I would like them to realize it and start acting constructively instead of being so harassing as they are now. Please note that nominating images to deletion due to violating freedom of panorama is not and has never been the issue with this account. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- i still believe this user is trying to contribute in good manner. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Modern primat: really? Please, tell us how, since it's hard to believe. -- Blackcat 23:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Two selective deletion requests (DR's) in a small category, while no DR for your favored image used in Wikidata.
[edit]Here on Wikidata you replaced an image and then did a Deletion Request (DR) for the image file you removed from wikidata here. The reason was "No FoP," but the image you recently placed in wikidata is also subject to this same exact DR reason ("No FoP"). However, you did not nominate for deletion the image you personally favored. You also nominated for deletion (DR), another similar image of the same building, and subject to the exact same "No FoP."
Would you please explain, why? I'm also, pinging @SchroCat Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 1.jpg appears to be de minimis, but File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 2.jpg isn't. I have no preferences on which image to be used. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- You wrote, "I have no preference on which image to be used," but you did have a preference by your nomination File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 2.jpg for deletion. So, why write that you "have no preference?" -- Ooligan (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I said no preference on which image to be used on Wikidata, not no preference on the deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- The words you wrote before this most recent reply- did not include the word "Wikidata," so you meant to write Wikidata, but didn't. I can't guess what you mean unless you write it.
- Your latest reply is deliberately misleading. Are you actually reading the links I provided above? -- Ooligan (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I said no preference on which image to be used on Wikidata, not no preference on the deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- You wrote, "I have no preference on which image to be used," but you did have a preference by your nomination File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 2.jpg for deletion. So, why write that you "have no preference?" -- Ooligan (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Your use of speedy delete SD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)- instead of more specific and accurate "duplicate."
[edit]As you know how to use the "duplicate" tag very well. This is the second time, that I'm aware that you used speedy delete reason G7, instead of the more accurate and specific "duplicate" tag. That earlier time you also used "SD|G7," instead of "duplicate" was just after your recent unblock.
Also, you used a deceptive edit summary by writing "doing 1 replacements" on these 5 duplicate files:
File:V20240429LJ-1091 (53893697533).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1173 (53893871105).jpg, File:V20240506LJ 0480 (53893871090).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1069 (53893460146).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1178 (53893460086).jpg.
I added the recommended specific duplicate tag to these files. In the future, please use duplicate tags per COM:SPEEDY. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Seems this bulk edit of theirs stuffed a number of things up - see my question below Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Your edit
[edit]Hi. I am curious - why did you mark File:Historical coal mine Hoym-Ignatius (8855330335).jpg as uncategorized? Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Should be a miss when performing a batch task. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
File:熱帶風暴戈登襲美國墨西哥灣沿岸地區.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
IrishSurfer21 (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Overhaul
[edit]Hi, please help me to check the upload from this user. It is suspected to be using fake license and claims. Exagren (talk) 02:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Rainbow flag (41842139504).jpg
- File:Lgbt flag (41842133194).jpg
- File:Pride rainbow (41842128894).jpg
- File:Gay pride (41842134944).jpg
- File:Lgbt flag (41842137574).jpg
- File:Lgbt (27694615857).jpg
Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
That's for defending against CP. Lemonaka (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC) |
File:Secretary Blinken Visits NEC Future Creation Hub (53888808696).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Pleiades (51381212690).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// sikander { talk } 🦖 14:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Milkyway and Perseid (51379448137).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// sikander { talk } 🦖 14:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
OK to merge Co-op tea DRs?
[edit]Would you mind if I merged these DRs that all relate to the same mural?
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Delicious Co-op Tea - geograph.org.uk - 3117786.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Delicious co-op tea, Rochdale Pioneers Museum.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Old-style ad for Co-op Tea (8066785463).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Side of the Rochdale Pioneers Museum (9439625154).jpg
This will avoid copying essentially the same discussion across four pages. --bjh21 (talk) 14:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done--A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! --bjh21 (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your deletion request Category The Virgin of Quito Monument in El Panecillo
[edit]The fact that you claim to be a supporter of the public domain on your user page can only be a bad joke. The fanaticism with which you want to delete entire categories shows that you are actually striving for a complete privatization of public space. Please change this mendacious self-disclosure, it's ridiculous. Arabsalam (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's FoP issue, not Public Domain. I personally still support PD. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service
[edit]I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.
The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.
Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).
Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Since we can't be certain if his photo is from before 1963 or possibly after, and whether it can be freely used without copyright restrictions, do you think we should consider removing it? Baginda 480 (talk) 14:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- His other photo also write taken before 1963, I think I need to ask you Baginda 480 (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Baginda 480: Mr. Hussein Onn became a member of Malaysian Parliament in 1971, then became a deputy PM in 1973 (later PM in 1976). Assuming the photo was taken when he took the oath of office as MP of Malaysia, it was definitely after 1963. I really doubt the date that marked by the uploader. If you feel this is unfree, you can submit it to DR. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm a newcomer here and still learning the ropes. Could you kindly assist me? I'd be very grateful. Thank you! Baginda 480 (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Baginda 480: Sure. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- thumb|
- This image also write before 1963 Baginda 480 (talk) 15:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also nominated. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you🙏Hope we can continue work together Baginda 480 (talk) 15:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also nominated. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Baginda 480: Sure. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm a newcomer here and still learning the ropes. Could you kindly assist me? I'd be very grateful. Thank you! Baginda 480 (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Baginda 480: Mr. Hussein Onn became a member of Malaysian Parliament in 1971, then became a deputy PM in 1973 (later PM in 1976). Assuming the photo was taken when he took the oath of office as MP of Malaysia, it was definitely after 1963. I really doubt the date that marked by the uploader. If you feel this is unfree, you can submit it to DR. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Presidential portrait of Michelle Bachelet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.