Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/02/Category:Round pizzas by slice

Category:Round pizzas by slice

	Category:Round pizzas by slice	Move to/Rename as	Category:Round pizzas by number of slices
	better convey actual meaning, better consistency with other "Objects by number of parts"
	Josh (talk) 00:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

	Category:Round pizzas (4)	Move to/Rename as	Category:Round pizzas with 4 slices
	Category:Round pizzas (6)	Move to/Rename as	Category:Round pizzas with 6 slices
	Category:Round pizzas (8)	Move to/Rename as	Category:Round pizzas with 8 slices
	Category:Round pizzas (9)	Move to/Rename as	Category:Round pizzas with 9 slices
	better convey actual intent of what the number indicates
	Josh (talk) 00:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

I agree with the need to rename. I wonder if something like "Round pizzas cut into <number> slices" would be better. "Round pizzas with 6 slices" could be interpreted as round pizzas that have 6 slices left, which is clearly not the case with this image. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

I thought about that... I think I am fine with 6 slices meaning 'originally cut into 6 slices', and if really worth it we can have 'with 5 of 6 slices remaining' or some such as a sub, but I also thought about how to word it more precisely. Maybe some form of note should be included on the category to explain? I do not really have much preference one way or the other on that aspect, I just really saw the '(4)', etc. and figured that had to be fixed. Josh (talk) 18:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

I agree too. Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

 Support to User:Joshbaumgartner. I agree too. -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 14:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

i support Auntof6's suggestion.

Round pizzas (9) made me think it means 9 inch pizzas. RZuo (talk) 11:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)